Record Details

Arbitral Tribunal Power to Disqualify Unethical Counsel

ICESBA

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Authentication Code dc
 
Title Statement Arbitral Tribunal Power to Disqualify Unethical Counsel
 
Added Entry - Uncontrolled Name Cristina FLORESCU; University Spiru Haret, Faculty of Legal, Political and Administrative Science Bucharest, 24 Sos. Berceni, 4th District, Bucharest, 41917, Romania Tel: +40 722236757, Fax: + 4021 3345263,
 
Uncontrolled Index Term Law
international arbitration, arbitrator, counsel, party representative, guidelines, conflicts of interest
F53, K19, K22, K29, K33, K41, K49
 
Summary, etc. In specific matters of conflicts of interest ethical issues in connection with the parties' legal representatives could occur in the course of arbitration proceedings. The purpose of this paper is to identify and investigate the current status of the arbitral tribunals and arbitral institutions power to sanction counsel’s misconduct in the event of conflicts of interest. Parties have a fundamental right to choose the counsel and in the same time the right to an independent and impartial tribunal, therefore the source of the arbitral tribunal power to disqualify a counsel is a hot topic. There are no express provisions granting arbitrators such power, only soft law instruments, but which have no binding effect as long as the parties do not agree on them. For these reasons, two renowned cases where international arbitral tribunals have dealt with the subject are examined. Different set of international and domestic rules have been applied by the arbitral tribunals and even if they held that arbitrators are empowered to sanction counsel’s misconduct, different outcomes on the issue have been retained: one tribunal found that the counsel is excluded from the proceedings, while the other deny this request and stated that such power would be exercised only rarely and in the most compelling situations. Therefore, developing “truly transnational” ethical rules and their implementation by the arbitral institutions might be a solution. Arbitral tribunals are establishing this issue on the basis of the undertaken and applied international soft law (professional guidelines) which gained credibility and popularity and also became accepted international standards in the arbitration field.
 
Publication, Distribution, Etc. International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration (ICESBA 2015)
2016-01-27 13:37:02
 
Index Term - Genre/Form Peer-reviewed Paper
 
Electronic Location and Access application/pdf
http://icesba.eu/ocs/index.php/icesba2015/icesba2015/paper/view/76
 
Data Source Entry International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration (ICESBA 2015); International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration (ICESBA 2015)
 
Language Note en
 
Terms Governing Use and Reproduction Note Authors who submit to this conference agree to the following terms:<br /> <strong>a)</strong> Authors retain copyright over their work, while allowing the conference to place this unpublished work under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</a>, which allows others to freely access, use, and share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial presentation at this conference.<br /> <strong>b)</strong> Authors are able to waive the terms of the CC license and enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution and subsequent publication of this work (e.g., publish a revised version in a journal, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial presentation at this conference.<br /> <strong>c)</strong> In addition, authors are encouraged to post and share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before and after the conference.